Posted tagged ‘Taleo’
September 28, 2012

Linda Merritt, HRO Research Analyst, NelsonHall
The 15th Annual PwC Global CEO Survey of 1,258 CEOs in 60 countries shows what CEOs want now from HR that transcends country and industry. PwC summed it up as:
- Protect the home market from uncertainty
- Attack new and emerging markets for growth.
Hockey legend Wayne Gretsky said that he skated to where the puck would be, not to where it was, anticipating the trajectory of change. This is hard for HR, which often takes years to complete a major change and looks to HRO with a focus on price and improving operational efficiency. Skating to where we needed to be yesterday is hard enough; how do we skate to where we need to be tomorrow?
CEOs Top Concern: Talent
For the last two years, the number one concern of CEOs in the PwC survey is talent. CEOs are personally concerned with developing leaders and the talent pipeline. Why? Because CEOs see that talent constraints and mismatches are already limiting opportunities. CEO talent concerns include:
- Talent-related expenses rising more than expected
- Not being able to innovate effectively
- Not being able to pursue a market opportunity
- Cancelling or delaying key strategic initiatives
- Not achieving growth forecasts in overseas markets.
Talent Gaps
Availability of key skills is a concern in every market outside of North America, especially for the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. This matches well with the drive to increase the global coverage of RPO.
Talent gaps are greater in some areas. In addition to global talent concerns, it is harder for some industries such as technology and pharmaceuticals / life sciences to find needed skilled talent. Of heightened concern is middle management talent. Will RPO best fit at the level of volume and skilled talent hires? Or will RPO further encroach into middle management recruiting?
The future is also about talent management and proof of HR’s business impact. This supports the movement we are seeing to strengthen talent management (TM) capabilities through M&A. Examples include:
- SAP and SuccessFactors
- Oracle and Taleo
- IBM and Kenexa.
CEOs Want Proof
Proof of business impact is part of HR metrics and advanced analytics. Even what should be the basics in workforce information is not considered comprehensive enough by most CEOs; they would like more data including the return on human capital investments, the cost of turnover, and staff productivity. HRO is ready with HR analytics as one of the newest components of HRO offerings.
Today, most HRO remains pressured on price rather than on value delivered. In hockey, someone must put the puck into play. In HR and HRO, someone must pay to develop the capabilities CEOs say they want. In the meantime, HRO is doing a good job of getting ready to skate to where business needs are going.
Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here.
Categories: HR, hr outsourcing, hro, PwC Global CEO Survey, rpo, Talent, Talent gaps
Tags: advanced analytics, Africa, developing leaders, global RPO, global talent concerns, HR, HR analytics, HR metrics, hro, IBM, Kenexa, Latin America, life sciences, Middle East, middle management recruiting, middle management talent, North America, operational efficiency, Oracle, pharmaceuticals, PwC, PwC Global CEO Survey, return on human capital, rpo, SAP, skilled talent hires, staff productivity, SuccessFactors, talent, talent constraints, talent gaps, talent management, talent mismatches, talent pipeline, Talent-related expenses, Taleo, technology, workforce information
Comments: Be the first to comment
September 13, 2012

Linda Merritt, HRO Research Analyst, NelsonHall
I have not seen such a range of varied opinions from members of the HRO and HR tech communities as those about IBM’s acquisition of Kenexa. The commentary showed that many were taken a bit by surprise and weren’t sure how to analyze the news that IBM was acquiring Kenexa for $1.3bn.
IBM Bought Kenexa?
The surprise was not the purchase of Kenexa, which was foreshadowed by the acquisition of Taleo by Oracle and SuccessFactors by SAP. It was more about the fact that IBM was doing the purchasing.
A few thought that ADP might make such an acquisition since it had already expanded its benefits capabilities with Workscape and SHPS and its RPO capabilities with The RightThing, so wouldn’t talent management make sense? Speculation continued, perhaps Mercer, Ceridian, or even ADP would be the target of an acquisition or merger.
IBM itself was considered likely to continue its acquisitive ways with something more in the talent management / HCM space. Likely targets mentioned included Cornerstone OnDemand, SilkRoad, SumTotal, Saba, with a few suggesting Halogen, Peoplefluent, and others. In short, someone is going to buy something else.
The Meaning of the Deal?
What does this mean we all asked, much like the tale of the Blind Men and the Elephant as was suggested by the leading light Naomi Bloom. Early viewpoints on the acquisition included:
- Continuing IBM’s move into social media and analytics
- Continuing IBM’s move into professional services including strengthening RPO
- Disrupting the HCM market and becoming a talent management player
- Delivering value to the HR executive
- Delivering value to the C-suite and bypassing HR
- Primarily being a HRO deal with some software attached
- Primarily being a software deal with some HRO attached
- Upping competition with SAP, Oracle, Salesforce.com, and even Workday
- Selling into Kenexa’s IBM-like customer base of Fortune 500 clients.
IBM’s news crossed many markets including HRO, HCM, HR tech (software, platform, cloud, etc.), BPO, social media, talent management, and financial and market analysts. Each commenter viewed the same information through the lens of their personal perspective and professional interest, much like the blind men touching different parts of the elephant.
With so many options before it, including IBM’s own announced intentions for the addition of Kenexa, the opportunities are new and exciting. Given the inherent complexities, IBM will face many risks as well. Look for more on The Parable of IBM and Kenexa coming in Part II.
Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here.
Categories: hr outsourcing, IBM, Kenexa, recruitment process outsourcing, Talent Management
Tags: ADP, Analytics, benefits, Blind Men and the Elephant, bpo, Ceridian, Cornerstone OnDemand, Halogen, HCM, HR Tech, hro, IBM, Kenexa, Mercer, Naomi Bloom, Oracle, PeopleFluent, rpo, Saba, Salesforce.com, SAP, SHPS, SilkRoad, social media, SuccessFactors, SumTotal, talent management, Taleo, The RightThing, Workday, Workscape
Comments: Be the first to comment
August 28, 2012

Gary Bragar, HRO Research Director, NelsonHall
Although a bit smaller than the $1.9bn Oracle paid for Taleo (coincidentally at $46 per share as well) and the $3.4bn SAP paid for SuccessFactors, I believe that IBM’s acquisition of Kenexa, a cash transaction at $46 per share or ~$1.3bn and closing in Q4 2012, will have a much more immediate and larger impact than the aforementioned acquisitions.
Both Taleo and SuccessFactors were specifically acquired for their talent management (TM) technology. Beyond the strength of Kenexa’s technology, however, is the provision of TM services including:
- Consulting
- RPO
- Employee engagement
- Leadership development.
According to an IBM study conducted earlier this year, 71% of respondents cited “human capital” as the leading source of sustained economic value, above products and services innovation and significantly higher than technology. Kenexa, as a HCM and TM provider, will compliment IBM’s TM offering, which focuses on the full TM life cycle of attracting, developing, rewarding, and retaining talent. Specifically, IBM’s TM offering includes:
- Recruiting
- Learning
- Performance management
- Compensation
- Succession management.
In addition to its multi-process HRO (MPHRO) offering, which includes TM, IBM also specializes in providing workforce strategy transformation, social technology, and analytics to predict and measure performance.
While RPO is part of IBM’s MPHRO offering, it also provides RPO on a standalone basis to GM. Kenexa’s RPO capabilities, however, will accelerate IBM’s RPO market share, making it one of the largest RPO providers globally with clients headquartered in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Kenexa also delivers RPO services in Latin America including South America in ~25% of its contracts.
Kenexa’s BrassRing technology is one of the two most widely used applicant tracking systems in RPO contracts. Kenexa also brings its Kenexa 2x Recruit platform, which in addition to recruiting and learning contains the following performance management modules:
- Goal setting
- Competencies
- Performance appraisals
- Compensation
- Career development and pathing
- Succession planning.
NelsonHall estimates that Kenexa has more than tripled the size of its RPO business since 2006 with brand name clients including Ford and multi-regional contracts with Baker Hughes and Eli Lilly.
IBM’s price of $46 per share is a 42% premium over Kenexa’s August 24th close, but it will be well worth it. IBM is getting much more than software technology; it is getting assets, including human talent that can make a HCM difference. IBM’s plan is to combine its approach to social business, analytics, and TM to transform business processes to create smarter workforces with measureable business results. Given Kenexa’s record of growth and IBM’s experience with integrating acquisitions, this sounds like a good plan and a great business opportunity for both companies.
Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here.
Categories: Acquisitions, hr outsourcing, hro, IBM, Kenexa, recruitment process outsourcing, RPO Offerings, Talent Management
Tags: acquisition, Analytics, attracting, Baker Hughes, BrassRing technology, business processes, compensation, Consulting, Eli Lilly, employee engagement, Ford, GM, HCM, human capital, human capital management, human talent, IBM, Innovation, Kenexa, Kenexa 2x Recruit, Leadership development, learning, MPHRO, multi-process HR outsourcing, Oracle, Performance appraisals, performance management, recruiting, retaining talent, rpo, SAP, smarter workforce, social business, social technology, software technology, SuccessFactors, succession management, succession planning, talent management life cycle, talent management services, Talent management technology, Taleo, workforce strategy transformation
Comments: Be the first to comment
August 3, 2012

Linda Merritt, HRO Research Analyst, NelsonHall
One of the hottest topics in HR and HRO has been talent management (TM), including everything from recruiting and RPO to performance management and employee engagement. Major ERP vendors have snapped up TM software leaders to strengthen HR product lines, e.g., SAP and SuccessFactors; Oracle and Taleo. Very good moves and very on trend, but let’s not forget about the less flashy powerhouse: workforce management (WM).
TM and WM are both critical components of human capital management (HCM) and depending on definitions and models, there can be a lot of overlap. For my purpose here, TM is about the individual and the capabilities for a specific job position and WM is about groups of workers and managing multiple positions.
TM involves attracting, retaining, and developing people with the required capabilities according to requested volumes and performance management. WM involves workforce planning and forecasting the capabilities and volumes needed and day-to-day scheduling and time and attendance. It takes both processes to have the right number of people, with the right skills, in the right places, at the right time.
Let’s consider two more elements, HR analytics and ROI, that will also benefit from seamless HR systems and processes, which our dear HRO community can enable and deliver. Timely and accurate workforce data is a foundation block upon which HR is built. At least part of the drive for multi-country payroll has been to get better employee data, and there is an important feeder into payroll: time reporting. Today’s leading time and attendance systems offer great flexibility in capturing the detailed data needed for payroll plus analyses of productivity, labor costing, pricing, project billing, workforce planning, etc.
Everybody wants to tie HR and HRO to ROI. Lowering the cost of HR operations alone is not enough. We must show real impact in measurable business results. Simplifying a bit, TM supports improved business results through customer satisfaction and revenues generated; WM supports improved business results through optimizing SG&A via operations and reducing losses.
Many HRO offerings come in basic and advanced levels. HRO providers– ensure you offer both levels of time and attendance, scheduling, and attendance management services. Buyers – take the time to determine whether advanced workforce management services will not only provide better data, but will pay for itself through reductions in overtime and the impact of absences. Also, for many positions and industries, ensuring all customer-facing seats are filled at the right capacity, capability, and time has a direct link to productivity and revenues. Finally, don’t forget about compliance with wage, hour, and labor regulations where accurate records and proactive scheduling are a great defense against fines and losses.
HR and HRO in partnership can be the bridge to strengthen TM and WM across the entire human capital value chain.
Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here
Categories: hr outsourcing, hro, Talent Management, Workforce Management
Tags: advanced workforce management, attendance management services, customer satisfaction, employee engagement, ERP, HCM, HR, HR analytics, HR processes, HR systems, hro, human capital management, multi-country payroll, Oracle, performance management, recruiting, ROI, rpo, SAP, SuccessFactors, talent management, Taleo, time and attendance, time reporting, workforce data, workforce management, workforce planning
Comments: Be the first to comment
February 20, 2012
As Howie Mandel always says to his guests after they’ve pressed the button and say “Deal!” on the TV show Deal or No Deal—”but was it a good deal?” Time will of course tell, but I do believe Oracle has made a very good deal. As the acquisition was announced just last February 9, I’ll briefly recap what had happened.
Oracle announced an agreement to buy Taleo for $46 per share, an 18% premium over Taleo’s stock price the day before the announcement, equating to $1.9 billion. As Taleo’s board has approved the acquisition, it is now subject to normal regulatory approval and is expected to close by summer. This follows SAP’s announcement on December 3, 2011 to acquire SuccessFactors for $3.4 billion. I had blogged about my take on the acquisition last December 13, 2011, stating that SuccessFactors is a provider of talent management software, but software alone does not get at the core of what makes for effective talent management. First, let me state that I also feel that SAP buying SuccessFactors was a good deal, albeit a steep price, as cloud-based software, including talent management is clearly on the rise and expected to continue to grow. NelsonHall has seen a large increase in the number of cloud SaaS HR services contracts and nearly 15% of HRO contracts in 2011 also included talent management software, often performance management, mostly in the mid-market.
Getting back to Oracle, Taleo provides cloud-based talent management software as well, so this is also a good deal, but how does that make this different? Because Taleo adds recruitment capability that Oracle did not have before. And although SuccessFactors provides recruitment software as does Taleo, Taleo also has an applicant tracking system that according to NelsonHall’s 2011 RPO report is the most widely used recruitment technology and applicant tracking system, utilized by approximately 80% of all RPO vendors for their clients, Oracle’s PeopleSoft had been in sixth place. The RPO report also noted that approximately 45% of all recruitment technology was platform-based. Taleo also has a business edition, popular in the mid-market for clients seeking a more standardized solution, used by vendors including Alexander Mann Solutions and Pinstripe. According to NelsonHall’s HRO forecast, RPO will have the highest growth of all HR services through the forecast period of 2015.
In summary, I think both acquisitions by SAP and Oracle are good; especially as clients continue to focus on talent management and recognize the need to have integrated technology and processes, most importantly supported by leadership that understand this. I’m in the final stages of my learning BPO research interviews and I‘m seeing a clear trend that learning vendors are now also providing talent management software and associated consulting services to their clients along with their learning services. I look forward to aggregating this data that I’ll present at the HRO Today Forum in Washington, DC on May 1st, titled State of the Learning BPO Marketplace, including the Emergence of Social Learning.
Gary Bragar, HRO Research Director, NelsonHall
Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by emailing amy.gurchensky@nelson-hall.com with “HRO Insight” as the subject.
Categories: Acquisitions, Business Process Outsourcing, Cloud, hr outsourcing, hr outsourcing research, hro, hro research, performance management, recruitment process outsourcing, RPO providers, SaaS, Talent Management
Tags: acquisition, Alexander Mann Solutions, bpo, cloud, Howie Mandel, HR, hr outsourcing, hro, hro research, nelsonhall, Oracle, PeopleSoft, performance management, Pinstripe, recruitment process outsourcing, rpo, SaaS, SAP, SuccessFactors, talent management, Taleo
Comments: 2 Comments
Recent Comments