A Closer Look at Benefits Administration in H1 2012: Part 2

Amy L. Gurchensky, HRO Research Analyst, NelsonHall

Part 1 of my mid-year benefits administration update covered several of the largest service providers, typically engaged in TBO services. Part 2 takes a closer look at TRO providers and updates from H&W vendors.

Fidelity Investments: Although it is a private corporation, from time to time Fidelity announces some of its success. H1 2012 was the company’s strongest half sales period in the last five years. It added 838 new DC administration clients, which will add ~522k participants to the ~15.7m it is currently serving. Fidelity has made substantial investments to strengthen its offering that will likely continue to fuel its success.

T. Rowe Price: While not as large as Fidelity, T. Rowe’s Administrative segment continues to report a steady growth rate of 3%. It prides itself on a long tenure rate with its clients and has plans to keep its offering competitive by introducing technological enhancements such as the T. Rowe Price Personal App for individuals and participants in employer-sponsored retirement plans.

JLT: Across the pond, JLT’s Employee Benefits segment, which includes revenues from consulting, outsourcing, and systems / technology, had a 5% growth rate in H1 2012. BenPal, its online integrated platform, is helping the company expand its benefits business internationally, which is likely to continue to have a positive effect on its bottom line.

Benefits providers in the U.K., the second largest benefits administration market behind the U.S. according to the 2012 Targeting Benefits Administration market analysis report, should also enjoy better than average growth due to new opportunities as a result of the automatic enrollment requirement of the Pensions Act of 2008 as well as opportunities in the public sector as budget concerns open doors to outsourcing assistance.

WageWorks: Newly public WageWorks provides a look into the high-technology SaaS H&W specialty services market of consumer-directed accounts including health (i.e., HRA, FSA, and HSA), commuter, and other employee spending accounts. Total revenues increased 29% y-o-y for Q2; its healthcare segment was up 21%. This year, it added US Airways as a client, expanded its contract with GE, and signed a channel partner agreement with Aflac that will add ~5k FSA clients and ~100k participants. It also entered into a reseller agreement with Aflac, which will continue to boost revenues beyond 2012.

Empyrean Benefit Solutions: Another private company touting its success in the H&W market is Empyrean, which has been offering services since 2007. It has set a record with year-to-date new client wins in H1 2012, adding 10 large market clients. The company is expecting 2012 revenues to increase 40% y-o-y.

Service providers who are slightly behind growth targets for 2012 or those who just want to perform better are prepping to make sure 2013 is a success. For some, this means focusing on health insurance exchanges or launching health and wellness offerings, and for others, it’s about enhancing existing offering with technology improvements and educational initiatives.

Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here.

Benefits Administration Poised for a Good Year: Part 1

If last quarter’s earnings reports are an indication of what will continue in 2012, then benefits administration service providers will have a good year.

Some of the financial highlights include Morneau Shepell’s record growth for Q1 of 22% year-over-year (y-o-y). Modest growth was reported elsewhere, but it’s significant in light of the economy and pending health care reform legislation. Providers with modest growth include Aon Hewitt, Towers Watson, Mercer, and T. Rowe Price.

Aon Hewitt’s outsourcing segment reported 3% y-o-y growth, 3% organic growth. Its organic growth began last quarter after four consecutive quarters of either flat or negative organic growth. New client wins are for its retiree health care exchange offering, dependent eligibility audits, and absence management services.

Towers Watson’s benefits segment reported 2% y-o-y growth, 3% organic growth. Its technology & administration solutions (TAS) line of business, which incorporates majority of its benefits administration revenues, had mid-single digit constant currency growth. Towers Watson also reported some new client wins for pension administration services within its retirement business.

Mercer’s outsourcing segment reported 0% y-o-y growth, 4% organic growth. The good news is that its outsourcing segment has recovered from its steady decline of organic growth that began in Q3 2011; the bad news is that growth was from 2011 client wins that came on this quarter, so this positive level might be temporary.  However, Mercer’s health & benefits consulting segment reported strong growth of 7% y-o-y, 6% organic, as did Towers Watson, which reported low double-digit constant currency growth for its health & group benefits segment. This is significant in that this strategy work may flow downstream and result in benefits administration contract awards later this year.

T. Rowe Price, although not a TBO service provider, reported 3% y-o-y growth for its administrative segment, which includes revenues from retirement plan services (RPS). RPS consists of DB, DC, and non-qualified plan administration services.

A new company to monitor is WageWorks, a H&W service provider offering reimbursement account and COBRA administration services. It commenced its IPO of 6.5m shares of common stock for $9 per share on May 10^th.

Tune in later this week to learn about the additional signs pointing to a good year for benefits administration service providers.

Amy L. Gurchensky, Research Analyst, HRO, NelsonHall

Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here.

M&A Activity in Benefits Administration: Round 2

Following the benefits administration merger and acquisition (M&A) frenzy of 2010 that resulted in some major consolidations including Aon Hewitt, Towers Watson, Xerox/ACS and ExcellerateHRO, to name a few, are we poised to see round 2?

The second wave actually began in early 2011 and tends to consist of the more established providers, in their own right, acquiring Tier 2 health and welfare (H&W) administration companies in the U.S.  Examples include:

• Towers Watson acquiring Aliquant in January 2011
• Sedgwick, a leader in the leave of absence administration market with ~20% market share, acquiring the productivity solutions unit of Nationwide Better Health in May 2011
• Morneau Shepell, the leading total benefits outsourcing (TBO) provider in Canada, acquiring SBC Systems Company in January 2012.

As of last week, we can now add ADP to this list since it signed a definitive agreement to acquire SHPS Human Resource Solutions—a subsidiary of SHPS, Inc. ADP has actually been making key acquisitions to strengthen components within its benefits administration offering for the last 18 months. It started with Workscape, which added compensation management services, and was followed by Asparity Decision Solutions for decision support tools and analytic capabilities.

Now, the SHPS acquisition strengthens ADP’s leave administration and reimbursement account administration offerings. The HSA and HRA components will be especially important considering the rising cost of health-care and the transition toward high-deductible health plans paired with these health savings accounts.

The H&W acquisition trend is also expanding beyond the U.S. It started in September 2010, when Capita – a U.K.-based HRO vendor providing total retirement outsourcing (TRO) exclusively in the U.K. – acquired FirstAssist Services Holdings for £12.5m. Then it continued when Mercer acquired REPCA – a brokering and advising firm for health and benefits (H&B) plans – to strengthen its H&B administration offering and advisory services in France.

The remaining question on my mind is whether U.S.-based TRO providers such as ING, Great-West, T. Rowe Price, etc. plan to jump on the H&W acquisition bandwagon to provide a one-stop shop for benefits administration like Fidelity Investments.

I’m eager to see who will make the next M&A move in benefits administration.  In the meantime, it’s always fun to hear about cross-selling opportunities that resulted in contract scope expansions.  Stay tuned.

Amy L. Gurchensky, Research Analyst, HRO, NelsonHall

Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by emailing amy.gurchensky@nelson-hall.com with “HRO Insight” as the subject.

The Changing Shape of DB and DC Administration

Practically all large market organizations have already outsourced defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) administration. Therefore, DB and DC administration contract activity is more about competitive wins.  When reading these contract award announcements, the first question I ask myself is, why did the client change service providers?

Some clients have a preference in the type of vendor used due to the large-scale financial worth of these portfolios. Some client executives prefer the independence of a non-financial administrator like Aon Hewitt, ACS/Xerox, or Mercer, while others prefer the industry closeness of a financial-type provider like Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, or Vanguard.

Other reasons for changing vendors include client dissatisfaction with the existing service or wanting to obtain a lower price or perhaps both.  Another cause revolves around vendor consolidation for both total retirement outsourcing (TRO) and total benefits outsourcing (TBO), which also includes health and welfare (H&W) administration. Consolidation is driven by a desire to reduce the number of vendors to a select few. Mergers and acquisitions also add to consolidation as integration occurs.

Last year produced a string of TRO and TBO contract awards due to consolidation, including the following:

• HP in North America: Fidelity became the exclusive TRO provider for HP, which had ~162,000 participants from EDS being served by other providers
• Office Depot: Fidelity was awarded this new TBO contract from three different providers that had administered the 401(k), H&W, and stock plans.

With an estimated $11bn market at stake, both financial and non-financial administrators need to remain competitive in the TRO and even TBO space. As a result, benefits administrators are offering additional service features such as automatic enrollment and automatic contribution escalation for client-employers, and resources to educate participants so that they become more accountable for their retirement savings.

This strategy is reinforced by Aon Hewitt’s recent survey of 500 large market U.S. employers representing more than 12m employees. The survey found that just 4% of employers are very confident that their employees will retire with enough savings, down from 30% last year. Examples of services and solutions recently launched to create a competitive edge include:

• Aon Hewitt’s DC advisory offering: providing online personalized advice and professional management with Financial Engines serving as a sub-advisor
• ADP’s strategic advisory services group: helping clients maximize the value of in-depth benefits data and analysis
• Mercer’s RetireTALK: an interactive website with hypothetical scenarios, designed to motivate and educate users on retirement planning
• Fidelity’s myPlan tool: offering online retirement advice based on answers to a few questions.

The Aon Hewitt survey also found that only 10% of employers are very confident that their employees are taking accountability for their own retirement success.  The remaining issue then is how to encourage employees to utilize these services and solutions that are already available to them and which service provider will best help both the employer and employees achieve their goals.

Amy L. Gurchensky, Research Analyst, HRO, NelsonHall

 Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by emailing amy.gurchensky@nelson-hall.com with “HRO Insight” as the subject.