What to Consider When Considering HR SaaS

Linda Merritt, HRO Research Analyst, NelsonHall

Based on the HR Outsourcing Association’s (HROA) SaaS webinars and my discussion with Ceridian’s senior vice president Howard Tarnoff, who has been instrumental in the successful launch of Ceridian’s Dayforce HCM, here are a few key elements to consider when considering SaaS.

Determine Business Needs

Determine what business, operational, and organizational needs are driving change and if each decision-factor is equal or if there is a rank order as needs often conflict. For example, the need for control and customization will come at a higher cost and takes more time and effort than the configuration and standardization that comes with SaaS.

Sometimes that process is not completed before bringing in potential vendors. Howard has sat in discovery process meetings where the buyer team is having this discussion amongst themselves as much as with the vendor. Maybe that’s a bit late, but better late than never.

Consider Trade-Offs

Consider what trade-offs will be needed to deliver the best solution. HR SaaS can meet many needs and deliver many benefits, but it is a fundamentally different choice than a traditional ERP or other licensed or subscription software products.

Configuration and standardization:  acceptance and understanding of configuration and standardization is growing, as is awareness of the on-going cost of customizing into a corner, according to Howard. Still, it is vital to determine the limits of what can be accommodated as configuration is not infinite.

If compliance is a key factor, then the pain of standardizing policies and processes to fit within a system where the vendor keeps up with the constant changes to complex governmental regulations may be a risk management plus.

IT collaboration: the role of IT changes and becomes more collaborative with SaaS.  The HROA SaaS series reminds us there will still be a role for IT to play, so bring them in early in the process to address:

• The impact on enterprise technology roadmap
• Changes to IT workload and budget
• Integration into the larger architecture (e.g., maintenance of interfaces, implication to other vendors connected to the system)
• Vendor-driven upgrades on the IT team (e.g., understand the role, workload, and timing).

Customer collaboration: with real SaaS you will be one of multiple clients using a web-based system riding a single code base and that changes the nature of the client-vendor relationship and opens the need and opportunity to collaborate with other customers. You may have more input into the development of system enhancements, but you will be one among others.

Worried about future-proofing your services? Howard says change is coming fast and furiously. SaaS, with a great vendor partner and an active team of client users, can support affordable innovation.

Quickly, the question is becoming not if, but when and where to use HR SaaS.

Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here.

What do Benefits Administration Clients Want from HRO?

Linda Merritt, HRO Research Analyst, NelsonHall

What HRO clients want falls into several buyer profiles based on familiarity with outsourcing and organization maturity. The NelsonHall Targeting Benefits Administration (BA) market analysis was published earlier this summer by Amy Gurchensky, and I noticed Amy included differences in client decision drivers by whether they were new to outsourcing or were already experienced in outsourcing. The concept crosses all types of HRO services and matches my running conversations with service providers. Let’s take a look at the following three buyer profiles through the lens of BA:

• Standard buyers
• Experienced buyers
• Progressive buyers.

Standard buyers: otherwise known as first time outsourcers are looking for reduced operating costs, better compliance with regulations, a way to transfer or minimize risk, updated technology and best practices, and improved participant communications channels. Employee and manager self-service and reducing HR administrative burdens are also popular drivers in the initial decision to outsource.

Experienced buyers: otherwise known as second generation outsourcers already have the basics in place and may be ready to broaden the scope of services, obtain more flexible technology, or increase participation in process streamlining to enhance efficiency and improve participant engagement. Changes may include adding new BA services or even consolidating vendors, but it can also include the decision to change to another vendor completely. Cost is still the number one concern, so contract renewals will not be a slam dunk. Providers who are on the ball with changing client needs and increased sophistication should be ready for thorough discussions on price, service, and value.

Progressive buyers: or sophisticated buyers may be ready to use the firm foundation they have built with their outsourcer to create the greatest possible business impact. In BA, this may include total benefits outsourcing where either pensions or retirement plan services are combined with health and welfare services under one vendor to:

• Lower total costs
• Simplify vendor management
• Integrate technologies across the services
• Improve the participant experience.

This is the time to bring out the most sophisticated offerings and analytics and focus on business value; leverage the value of benefits in employee attraction and retention; and optimize total program cost. Once again, existing BA vendors will be vulnerable to pricing concerns and client perceptions about the provider’s top-end capabilities and client retention will remain at risk.

As HRO matures and more clients gain experience in managing outsourced services, expect to see client needs change over time. Service providers can and do quickly tell which HRO profile a new prospect falls into by the language used, initial discussions on services, and outsourcing objectives, etc. It can be a bit harder to see when an existing client, even one satisfied with day-to-day services, is moving from one buyer profile to another. For clients new to BA, if you intend or even just hope to move up to the sophisticated buyer level, consider if the vendor who meets your initial needs will also meet your needs as your organization matures.

Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here

Benefits Administration Poised for a Good Year: Part 2

Earlier this week, I highlighted revenue growth reported by benefits administration service providers. In addition to the positive earnings reported, there are other signs indicating that 2012 will be good to benefits administration including acquisitions, hiring, and surveys.

There have been a few strategic acquisitions that will boost benefits administration revenues for vendors this year. For example, ADP’s benefits administration business will see a nice increase from SHPS, which had annualized revenues of ~$80m. Morneau Shepell’s acquisition of SBC Systems Company will modestly increase its revenues, and more importantly will strengthen the company’s presence in the U.S. Finally and most recently announced is Towers Watson’s acquisition of Extend Health, which will enhance its benefits administration offering by adding exchange services for retirees.

Another positive sign of expected future growth is the hiring of personnel. Towers Watson announced that it will be hiring employees within all of its segments. The benefits segment, specifically, will get an additional 172 employees, 60 of which will be for technology & administration solutions (TAS).

Finally, regardless of the constitutionality of the PPACA, benefits administration will likely flourish as compliance becomes increasingly complex as new regulations are issued or as older ones are amended for other federal laws such as COBRA, HIPAA, FMLA, etc.

A recent study by ADP cites that health care reform and compliance complexity are expected to lead to more benefits administration outsourcing. The survey, which included input from 504 HR and benefits decision makers in the U.S., found that ensuring compliance is one of the top reasons cited for outsourcing benefits administration.

In a recent article, Mercer is also advising employers to act to ensure compliance and to implement cost-control strategies now regardless of health care reform. It recommends the following, which are all dollar signs for benefits administration service providers:

• Managing the cost of dependent coverage, which will strengthen demand for dependent eligibility audits and verifications
• Shifting to CDHPs, which will lead to an increase for reimbursement account administration services including FSAs, HSAs, and HRAs
• Offering cost-competitive health coverage, which will boost demand for private health care exchanges for both active and retired employees
• Encouraging a healthier workforce, which will lead to the implementation of wellness programs (i.e., health assessments, biometric screenings, etc.).

Benefits administration is one of the oldest foundations of HR business process outsourcing and it is also one of the largest segments in revenues and yet it remains vital, adaptive, competitive, and ready for continued growth!

Amy L. Gurchensky, Research Analyst, HRO, NelsonHall

Interested in reading the latest HRO news from NelsonHall? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here.

The Compliance Rules, They are a Changing (and Present Opps for HRO)

Compliance is not always the most exciting topic, and being the manager of workforce safety, leave of absence and FMLA were on Kris Dunn’s Workforce.com list of the Five Worst Jobs in HR. Exciting or not, compliance is important to both employees and employers, and is a major regulatory focus of the current U.S. administration. It is also an opportunity for HR outsourcing.

I was reading the just-published U.S. Department of Labor’s Fall 2009 Regulatory Plan agenda (really, I was…I need to get a more exciting life!) and the list of proposed changes is very long and touches on many HRO service areas. Here are a few examples of proposals:

•  LOA/FMLA: review the implementation of the new military family leave amendments to the Family and Medical Leave Act, as well as other provisions of the FMLA regulations that were revised and implemented in January 2009

•  Benefits: Clarify the circumstances under which a person will be considered a fiduciary when providing investment advice to employee benefit plans and their participants and beneficiaries, and require defined benefit plan administrators to provide all participants, beneficiaries and other parties with detailed information regarding their plan’s funding status  

•  OSHA: collection of additional data to help employers and workers track injuries at individual workplaces

•  Wage & Hour: update decades old recordkeeping regulations in order to enhance the transparency and disclosure to workers as to how their wages are computed, and to allow for new workplace practices such as telework and flexiplace arrangements

While large-scale HRO is not usually driven by compliance issues, it is a benefit of outsourcing increasingly valued by buyers.

Continually updated regulatory compliance support and reports can be designed into HR services delivery systems and make any audits much easier to support with thorough documentation.

Training and coverage of required reviews are also a part of a compliance system. On Monday, my NelsonHall colleague Gary Bragar and I were catching up on the learning activities of a multi-process HRO provider and we briefly discussed compliance training. Too often it is funded at the lowest possible level and designed to meet the letter of the regulations and to document participant coverage. It can entirely miss the larger point of application in real work situations as well as the value and spirit behind the regulations.

Significant expertise is required to manage benefit and health and safety programs. Having an HRO partner that keeps up on the regulations and can help buyers design and administer a cost effective program brings real value to the business, HR and to employees. Compliance tracking and reporting can indeed be tedious, but compliance coverage and training need not be.

Learning vendors — be creative  and show clients how they can leverage outsourced compliance training services to provide coverage that really works and is still low cost. 

At the end of the day, compliance is about value-based fairness, and impacts the real lives of employees and communities and an HRO provider partner can help companies maintain the balance between compassion, compliance and cost.

Linda Merritt, Research Director, HRO, NelsonHall